丁瑞君,武荷岚

• 1:同济大学物理科学与工程学院

摘要(Abstract)：

随着互动教学越来越普遍,同伴互评越来越受到众多研究者及一线教师的青睐。本文以同济大学大学物理课程为例,从实际应用的角度出发,对中国大学MOOC平台中同伴互评的应用效果进行研究,以期能对其优势与不足有一个全面的认识。结果发现同伴互评不仅能在一定程度上减轻教师的评价负担,且有助于提升学生多方面的能力,当然也存在一些需要改进的算法问题。

关键词(KeyWords)： 同伴互评;成绩相关性;大学物理

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 基金项目:基于群动力理论的协作学习与同伴评估模型研究(2017CXXM06)

作者(Author): 丁瑞君,武荷岚

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Jenkins M.Unfulfilled promise:Formative assessment using computer-aided assessment[J],Learning and Teaching in Higher Education,2004,1(1):67-80.
• [2]Prins F J,Sluijsmans D M,Kirschner P A,et al.Formative peer assessment in a cscl environment:A case study[J].Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education,2005,30(4):417-444.
• [3]Min H T.The effects of trained peer review on efl students revision types and writing quality[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2006,15(2):118-141.
• [4]莫俊华.同伴互评:提高大学生写作自主性[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2007(3):35-39.
• [5]Chen C H.The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self-and peer-assessment system[J].Computers&Education,2010,55(1):229-236.
• [6]Hwang G J,Hung C M,Chen N S.Improving learning achievements,motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach[J].Educational Technology Research and Development,2014,62(2):129-145.
• [7]Cho K,Schunn C,Wilson R.Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing From Instructor and Student Perspectives[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,2006,98(4):891-901.
• [8]刘玲.MOOC中同伴互评的功能与策略探究——以ed X、Coursera平台及北京大学的MOOC课程为例[J].工业和信息化教育,2014(11):11-16.