DING Lin,张萍,徐祯

• 1:长江大学物理与光电工程学院
• 2:俄亥俄州立大学教育学院
• 3:北京师范大学物理学系

摘要(Abstract)：

应《物理与工程》邀约,2019年我们开始相对系统地撰写"物理教育量化研究入门"系列文章。目前已经发文2篇,分别是《物理教育研究中的量化研究方法》(总述,《物理与工程》2019年第3期第3—7页)和《物理教育量化研究方法:调查研究与描述统计》(《物理与工程》2019年第4期第3-6页)。本文是该系列文章的第3篇,主要介绍物理教育研究中的实验/准实验研究的基本概念和相关数据分析的入门知识,为有兴趣进入物理教育研究领域的教师展现出关于物理教育实验/准实验研究的一幅简图和路径方向。

关键词(KeyWords)： 物理教育研究;量化研究方法;物理教育实验/准实验研究;推断统计

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 湖北省2017年高等学校省级教学研究项目“基于形成性评价的混合式学习活动设计与实践研究”(2017276)

作者(Author): DING Lin,张萍,徐祯

参考文献(References)：

• [1] FRAENKEL J R,WALLEN N E,HYUN H.How to design and evaluate research in education[M].New York :McGraw-Hill Higher Education,2012.
• [2] DING L,LIU X,HARPER K.Getting started with quantitative methods in physics education research[R]//HENDERSON C,HARPER K.Eds.Getting started in PER—Reviews in PER.CollegePark,MD American Association of Physics Teachers,2012,2:1-33.
• [3] DING L.Theoretical perspectives of quantitative physics education research[J].Physical Review Physics Education Research,2019,15(2):020101.
• [4] HAKE R R.Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods:A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses[J].American journal of Physics,1998,66(1):64-74.
• [5] DING L,申亚琴，张萍.物理教育量化研究方法：调查研究与描述统计[J].物理与工程，2019,29(4):3-6.DING L,SHEN Y Q,ZHANG P.Quantitative methods in physics education research:Survey research and descriptive statistics[J].Physics and Engineering,2019,29(4):3-6.(in Chinese)
• [6] DING L,张萍，贾泽皓.物理教育研究中的量化研究方法[J].物理与工程，2019,29(2):78-82.DING L,ZHANG P,JIA Z H.Quantitative methods in physics education research[J].Physics and Engineering,2019,29(2):78-82.(in Chinese)
• [7] POLLOCK S J.Longitudinal study of student conceptual understanding in electricity and magnetism[J].Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research,2009,5(2):020110.
• [8] MCPADDEN D,BREWE E.Impact of the second semester university modeling instruction course on students’ representation choices[J].Physical Review Physics Education Research,2017,13(2):020129.
• [9] STEWART J,GRIFFIN H,STEWART G.Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory[J].Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research,2007,3(1):010102.
• [10] DAY J,BONN D.Development of the concise data processing assessment[J].Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research,2011,7(1):010114.
• [11] NIEMINEN P,SAVINAINEN A,VIIRI J.Force concept inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency[J].Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research,2010,6(2):020109.
• [12] BREWE E,SAWTELLE V,KRAMER L H,et al.Toward equity through participation in Modeling Instruction in introductory university physics[J].Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research,2010,6(1):010106.
• [13] TURPEN C,FINKELSTEIN N D.The construction of different classroom norms during Peer Instruction:Students perceive differences[J].Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research,2010,6(2):020123.
• [14] CLEMENT J.Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics[J].American Journal of physics,1982,50(1):66-71.
• [15] DING L,张萍.美国物理教育研究：历史回顾和前瞻[J].物理与工程，2018,028(1):29-34.DING L,ZHANG P.Foundations and frontiers of physics education research in thr U.S[J].Physics and Engineering,2018,28(1):29-34.(in Chinese)